After reading and performing The Twelfth Night, I was curious about the purpose of the confusing
gender roles within Shakespeare’s work. So,
I brought my questions to JSTOR and found a plethora of insights from an
article titled, “Gender Trouble in Twelfth Night”.
This
article stated that historically all male actors would have performed the Twelfth Night in the Elizabethan
theaters. Apparently, the use of only
male actors was intentional in order to “avoid a real fear of women’s
sexuality” and to show an “nonthreatening version of female erotic power”
(Charles 126). Through involving only
make figures, the power of a woman in sexual circumstances is diluted and
confused because it is not actually women acting out these roles. Therefore, any portrayal of female sexuality
is fashioned for the play’s purposes and can hardly be compared to a real
woman’s actions and power. As the
article I read stated, “Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night is arguably about the
fashioning of gender” (Charles 124).
Because of
the use of male actors only, the cross-dressing of characters, such as Viola, caused
an extra level of confusion on stage than what is shown in the script. For example, in the script Viola’s character disguises
herself as a male figure with the name as Cesario; however, in Elizabethan
theater this gender swap was confused even more on stage because the actor was
originally a male in the first place.
This complexity clearly blurs the gender of Viola, making the sexual
attraction of Olivia toward Viola confusing and subtly homosexual. What I found interesting about my research was
Charles’ perspective on the purpose of these homosexual hints and how
homosexuality all relates to Shakespeare’s commentary about love. Charles claims, “Lovers like Olivia, Orsino,
Malvolio, and Antonio construct fantasies that turn the objects of their
affection into something more than they are, thereby disrupting the boundaries
of compulsory heterosexuality and class-consciousness through the performance
of these imaginary fantasies,” (Charles 124).
This insight reveals that perhaps Shakespeare is getting to the idea
that love can be fashioned and directed at anyone because the object of one’s
love is completely in the eye of the beholder.
Because of his use of cross-dressing and romantic love within sex-same
actors and characters, this fashioned and imagined love becomes evident not
only in the plot of the play but also through the directional choices behind
the scenes.
Clearly, gender
swaps and hints of homosexuality are the core of Shakespeare’s message. Through my reading of the play and outside
research, it seems as though Shakespeare’s intentions were to challenge the
boundaries of sex-based roles and heterosexuality during his era.
Works Cited:
Works Cited:
Charles, Casey. "Gender Trouble in
Twelfth Night." Theatre Journal, Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 121-141. JSTOR. The Johns
Hopkins University Press, May 1997. Web. 3 Nov. 2013.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3208678
Izzy,
ReplyDeleteYup. This was a time, in the early modern period, when men and women were experimenting w/ gender roles. And, it's clear that this play is both making fun of the experimentation as well as sort of giving everyone license to do so.